Cases 11 - 20 of 82
DOEBLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
JOSEPH DOEBLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KARAHALIOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00251
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KARAHALIOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCADAMS v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2022cv00247
Petitioner:
TREMARCUS RAYVON MCADAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
OBEY v. COLLIE et al.
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DEVON OBEY
Defendant:
OFFICER COLLIE, UNIT MANAGER COLLEY, OFFICER DONOGHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBIN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv00825
Petitioner:
GREGORY IZEAR CORBIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN FCI MCKEAN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NESTOR v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2021cv00319
Petitioner:
RUSSELL NESTOR
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. FCI McKean, Warden
as 1:2021fp00767
Petitioner:
Eddie Jones
Respondent:
FCI McKean, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GILBERT v. N.E. REGIONAL COUNSEL
as 1:2021cv00248
Petitioner:
MARCUS GILBERT
Respondent:
N.E. REGIONAL COUNSEL, WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOYD v. FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
as 1:2020cv00111
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOYD, JR.
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARINO v. TRATE et al
as 1:2020cv00086
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN, PA and WARDEN TRATE
Petitioner:
VINCENT MICHAEL MARINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
