Cases 61 - 70 of 73
WILLIAMS v. FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00007
Petitioner:
BRAYLYN WILLIAMS
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CRAWFORD v. WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2017cv00261
Petitioner:
CASWELL A. CRAWFORD
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SHAW v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2017cv00253
Petitioner:
KEITH SHAW
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TORRES v. FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
as 1:2017cv00243
Petitioner:
DAVID TORRES
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TROTMAN v. WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2017cv00235
Petitioner:
ENERVA W. TROTMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCLAIN v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2017cv00091
Petitioner:
JERMAINE McCLAIN
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VERDEKAL v. WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2017cv00040
Petitioner:
ADAM JOHN VERDEKAL
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RUSHTON v. FBOP et al
as 1:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
SEAN RUSHTON
Defendant:
FBOP, FCI MCKEAN and FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. GAGNON et al
as 1:2009cv00286
Petitioner:
ERIC MURRAY
Respondent:
GAGNON, ANY ACTING/INTERIM WARDEN @ FCI MCKEAN and NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LAGOS et al v. RUSHTON et al
as 1:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
RAMON ODIN LAGOS, RICARDO CRUZAGOSTO, GUADALUPE DE ANDA and others
Defendant:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, AND EXECUTIVES and FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
