Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jeremy Mount v. J. Fikes, et al
as 24-1047
Plaintiff:
Jeremy David Mount, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Warden J. Fikes, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of FCI Sandstone of PINE County, D. Drilling, individually and in his official capacities as correctional officer for the mail room of FCI-Sandstone PINE county and J. Best, individually and in his official capacities as Correctional Officer of FCI-Sandstone Mail Room of PINE County
EUTSEY v. FCI SANDSTONE et al
as 2:2023cv03871
Petitioner:
KEITH EUTSEY
Respondent:
FCI SANDSTONE, BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Xayamonty v. Thomas et al
as 0:2023cv00726
Petitioner:
Khamsay Zayamonty and Khamsay Xayamonty
Respondent:
Warden Thomas, Mr. Vanhover, BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Block v. Fikes
as 0:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
J Fikes, Acting Warden, Acting Associate Warden's 1,2,3. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Fikes et al
as 0:2021cv01269
Petitioner:
Reginald Anthony Walton
Respondent:
Warden Fikes and FCI-Sandstone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brandon Dalton v. J. Fikes, et al
as 20-3475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon Dalton
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden J. Fikes, FCI - Sandstone
Dalton v. FCI Sandstone
as 0:2020cv01667
Respondent:
FCI Sandstone
Petitioner:
Brandon Dalton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Andre Saunders v. Warden
as 19-3677
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden, FCI-Sandstone
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andre Saunders
Dennell Malone v. Warden FCI Sandstone
as 19-2562
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dennell Malone
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden FCI Sandstone
Saunders v. Warden, FCI-Sandstone
as 0:2019cv01551
Petitioner:
Andre Saunders
Respondent:
Warden, FCI-Sandstone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
