Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Monroe v. FCI Terre Haute
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Joseph Monroe
Defendant:
FCI Terre Haute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GENOVESE v. WARDEN FCI TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2023cv00455
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS GENOVESE
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MURPHY v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
JAMES PATRICK MURPHY
Respondent:
T. RULE and FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
KIEFFE SR v. FCI TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KIEFFE SR
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SELLS v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
JEROMEE SELLS
Respondent:
T. RULE and FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLINKENBEARD v. FCI TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLINKENBEARD
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE, J BALLARD and COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BUNTON v. FCI TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
PAUL BUNTON
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Farooque Ahmed v. BOP, et al
as 21-5134
Defendant / Appellee:
Ian Connors, Administrator, Nat'l Inmate Affairs, Federal Bureau of Prisons, BOP, Sara M. Revell, Res. Dir., N. Cent. Regional Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Farooque Ahmed
CELESTINE v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. GOODRIDGE and NARON K. CELESTINE
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Smith v. USA, et al
as 19-1260
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAUMONT FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, FCI TERRE HAUTE, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION PEKIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
