Cases 11 - 20 of 32
HERZ v. SASSO et al
as 1:2018cv02817
Defendant:
RICHARD L. YOUNG, MITCH MCCONNELL, SEAN PERSIN and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chelmowski v. Federal Communication Commission
as 1:2016cv05587
Defendant:
Federal Communication Commission
Plaintiff:
James Chelmowski
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Prof'l Assoc. for Customer Eng v. FCC
as 15-2489
Petitioner:
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
HaNiyyah Ali v. Pentagon, et al
as 12-2667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HANIYYAH N. ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
PENTAGON, AT&T CORPORATION, (Illinois Bell), FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
Ali et al v. The Pentagon et al
as 1:2012cv04264
Plaintiff:
Haniyyah N Ali and R.W.A.
Defendant:
The Pentagon , U.S. N.S.A./Oversight/AT&T , AT&T (Illinois Bell) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gamache, Gregory v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al
as 3:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Greg Gamache
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamache v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Greg Gamache
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675
Weigel Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
as 1:2011cv00236
Plaintiff:
Weigel Broadcasting Co.
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Anderson v. Federal Communication Commission
as 1:2010cv06704
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Mark Anderson
Defendant:
Federal Communication Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Louis Fasullo v. People of the United States o, et al
as 09-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS FASULLO
Defendant - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
