Cases 111 - 120 of 1,295
China Unicom (Americas) Opera v. FCC, et al
as 22-70029
Petitioner:
CHINA UNICOM (AMERICAS) OPERATIONS LIMITED
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 22-60008
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Kersten Conway and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission
Howard v. Federal Communications Commission
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Ladreco Howard
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coretel Delaware Inc, et al v. FCC
as 21-3170
Petitioner:
CORETEL DELAWARE INC, CORETEL NEW JERSEY INC, CORE COMMUNICATIONS INC and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Foundation for a Beautiful Life v. FCC
as 21-1239
Appellant:
Foundation for a Beautiful Life
Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Caudle v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 5:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Department of Justice, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
China Telecom (Americas) Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 21-1233
Petitioner:
China Telecom (Americas) Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Wide Voice, LLC v. FCC, et al
as 21-71375
Petitioner:
WIDE VOICE, LLC
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LLC and others
Consumers' Research, et al v. FCC, et al
as 21-3886
Petitioner:
CONSUMERS' RESEARCH, CAUSE BASED COMMERCE, INC., JOSEPH BAYLY and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
