Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 22-60363
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Kersten Conway and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 22-60195
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Kersten Conway and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 22-60008
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Kersten Conway and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission
Howard v. Federal Communications Commission
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Ladreco Howard
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huawei Technol USA v. FCC
as 21-60089
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Petitioner:
Huawei Technologies Company, Limited and Huawei Technologies USA, Incorporated
Garcia v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv00429
Plaintiff:
Frank Nunez Garcia
Defendant:
The Watchtower, Unidentified Prisoners, NFN Tesch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huawei Technologies USA, Inc, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-60896
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, LIMITED and HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INCORPORATED
Beaver v. Federal Beraual Investigation Agency et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
Tom Claney, Donald Trump, Ajit Pai and others
Plaintiff:
Martel Beaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worldcall Interconnect, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 17-60736
Petitioner:
WORLDCALL INTERCONNECT, INCORPORATED, also known as Evolve Broadband, Complainant
Respondent:
AT&T MOBILITY, L.L.C., FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CenturyLink, Incorporated v. FCC, et al
as 17-60439
Petitioner:
CENTURYLINK, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
