Cases 31 - 40 of 152
City of Pittsburgh v. FCC, et al
as 19-72880
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner:
LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Alliance for Communications, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72736
Petitioner:
CITY OF PALO ALTO, ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA, ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNICATIONS DEMOCRACY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Frost v. Federal Communications Commission
as 4:2019cv07144
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission
Plaintiff:
Vinton Frost
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553
State of Hawaii v. FCC, et al
as 19-72699
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
STATE OF HAWAII
CPUC v. FCC, et al
as 19-72490
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
City of Portland, Oregon, et al v. USA, et al
as 19-72391
Petitioner:
SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION, MT. HOOD CABLE REGULATORY COMMISSION, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Eugene, Oregon v. FCC, et al
as 19-72219
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON
City and County of San Fran v. FCC, et al
as 19-71832
Petitioner:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, California
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Emrit v. Soros et al
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), George Soros, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
