Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Valuevision Media, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 08-3370
Petitioner: VALUEVISION MEDIA, INC., dba ShopNBC
Intervenor: COMMUNITY BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION, CARIBE VISION HOLDINGS, INC., CARIBE VISION TV NETWORK, LLC and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United Church of Christ Office v. FCC, et al
as 08-3325
Petitioner: UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION, INC.
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United Church of Christ Office v. FCC, et al
as 08-3245
Petitioner: UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION, INC.
Intervenor: NATIONAL CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC., VERIZON, TVC BROADCASTING. LLC and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Office of Communication of the v. FCC, et al
as 08-3234
Petitioner: OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, INC.
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Montgomery County, Maryland v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-3023
Petitioner: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor: VERIZON
Michigan Bell Telephone Compan v. J. Lark, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2469
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, dba Michigan Bell Telephone Co., AT&T Michigan
Intervenor - Appellant: COVAD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, TALK AMERICA INC. and XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
Intervenor: MCLEODUSA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. and TDS METROCOM, LLC
Defendant: J. PETER LARK, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission and not as individuals, LAURA CHAPPELLE, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission and not as individuals and MONICA MARTINEZ, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission and not as individuals
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Michigan Bell Telephone Compan v. Laura Chappelle, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2473
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, dba AT&T Michigan
Defendant - Appellant: LAURA CHAPPELLE, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission and not as individuals, J. PETER LARK, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission and not as individuals and MONICA MARTINEZ, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission and not as individuals
Intervenor: COVAD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, TALK AMERICA INC., MCLEODUSA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
US Conf of Mayors v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-3675
Petitioner: UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOWNS AND TOWNSHIPS, ACCESS SACRAMENTO, CAPITAL COMMUNITY TELEVISION and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fairfax Cty VA v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-3677
Petitioner: FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOWNS AND TOWNSHIPS, ACCESS SACRAMENTO, CAPITAL COMMUNITY TELEVISION and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alliance Comm v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-3676
Petitioner: ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNICATIONS DEMOCRACY
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOWNS AND TOWNSHIPS, ACCESS SACRAMENTO, CAPITAL COMMUNITY TELEVISION and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?