Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
NASH v. PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2012cv02648
Defendant: MAYOR OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES ANSPITZ, PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff: AASIM NASH
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Pavalone v. United States Department of Defense et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01448
Plaintiff: Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant: United States Department of Defense, United States Department Of Justice, Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
GAMACHE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00059
Plaintiff: GREG GAMACHE
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
ABBOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00297
Defendant: CLERKS OFFICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff: DOMINIC JOSEPH ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Federal Trade Commission et al v. International Product Design, Inc. et al
as 3:2007mc00017
Defendant: Peter Doran, Azure Communications, Inc, International Licensing Corp. and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Receiver: Phillip S. Stenger
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. INTERNATIONAL PRODUCT DESIGN, INC. et al
as 2:2007mc00011
Defendant: PETER DORAN, INTERNATIONAL PRODUCT DESIGN, INC., THE INNOVATION CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Appointment of Receiver

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?