Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bailey v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv04357
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Bailey
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and Fedex Kinko's Office and Print Services Inc. Group Long-Term Disability Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mark Johnson v. Fedex/Kinko's # 1726
as 12-4522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JOHNSON, dba JQ Solutions
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDEX/KINKO'S # 1726
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01279
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
California State Police (California Highway Police), City of San Diego, California, County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency, (HHSA) Forensic Services Unit, San Diego, California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Eric Shields v. FedEx Kinko, et al
as 12-2440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Bernard Shields
Defendant - Appellee:
FedEx Kinko, Bryant Coleman, Store Manager and Jeff Perrin, Assistant Store Manager
Anaeme et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv02555
Defendant:
Mr Acevado, Y Adiboye, S Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
JQ Solutions v. Fedex/Kinko's #1726
as 1:2011cv00563
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Fedex/Kinko's #1726
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shields v. FedEx Kinko et al
as 4:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Eric Bernard Shields
Defendant:
FedEx Kinko, Bryant Coleman and Jeff Perrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
