Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Santana v. Exodus Transitional Community, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
Fernando Santana
Defendant:
Exodus Transitional Community, Inc., Julio Medina, Kathleen Bernier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santana v. Exodus Transitional Community, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02173
Plaintiff:
Fernando Santana
Defendant:
Exodus, Transitional Community, Inc., Julio Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santana v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv04720
Defendant:
City of New York Police Department and Police Officer John Doe
Plaintiff:
Fernando Santana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTANA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37008
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN FERNANDO SANTANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santana v. Dobbs Ferry Police Department et al
as 7:2018cv10321
Plaintiff:
Fernando Santana
Defendant:
Dobbs Ferry Police Department, Police Officer John Doe 1, Police Officer John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santana v. The Warden of G.R.V.C. et al
as 1:2014cv05988
Plaintiff:
Fernando Santana
Defendant:
The Warden of G.R.V.C., Deputy of Security for G.R.V.C., Captain of Security for G.R.V.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernando Santana-Montes v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71591
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANTANA-MONTES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Santana v. Presley et al
as 1:2012cv02028
Plaintiff:
Fernando Santana
Defendant:
Presley, Wynn, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Fernando Santana-Moreno
as 11-40270
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FERNANDO SANTANA-MORENO, also known as Santiago Torresitas-Laguna
PEREZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53066
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO SANTANA PEREZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
