Cases 81 - 90 of 1,244
WEST v. AC & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68120
Plaintiff:
MERLE WEST
Defendant:
AC & S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRADDOCK v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68114
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRADDOCK
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68109
Plaintiff:
DALE E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68112
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERTS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , AW CHESTERTON CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEMKE v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68110
Plaintiff:
LYNETTE LEMKE
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAGG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67761
Plaintiff:
MORRIS FAGG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KREJCAREK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67789
Plaintiff:
MELVIN KREJCAREK
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RYAN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67864
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR F. RYAN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HELD v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67814
Plaintiff:
DONALD HELD
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PONTZLOFF v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67882
Plaintiff:
SANDRA M PONTZLOFF
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
