Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Brulport v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JEAN BRULPORT and Barbara Jean Brulport, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Steven Bruce Brulport, Deceased
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Aerco International, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Farris v. Avon Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02023
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Brenntag Specialties LLC, DCO LLC, ITT, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Burnham LLC, Empire Comfort Systems, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, GG of Florida, Inc., Goulds Pumps (N.Y.) Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Goulds Pumps LLC, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA), LLC, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Lennox International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Pitcher et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09813
Cross Defendant:
John Pitcher, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Pitcher
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Barretts Minerals Inc., Brenntag North America, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Block Drug Company, FMC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 as Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Mustapick et al v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02305
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings, Corp., General Refractories Company and others
Plaintiff:
Irene Mustapick and Gerald Mustapick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gavin et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv02303
Defendant:
Gardner Denver, Inc., Goodyear Tire & Rubber CO., General Refractories Company and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Gavin and Edward Gavin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Donohue et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv07232
Defendant:
CBS Corporation , ABB, Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael B Donohue and Anne Donohue
Debtor:
Viking Pump Inc. and The City Of New York
Cross_claimant:
Flowserve US Inc. , Crane Co. and Carrier Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Flowserve US Inc. , ABB, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robins et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04111
Plaintiff:
Dennis Robins and Christine Robins
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., CBS Corporation , Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. , Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Eaton Electrical Inc., and Cutler-Hammer, Inc. , Crane Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. , Alfa Laval, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stein v. Rusnack et al
as 1:2016cv02487
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
William C Rusnack, Lynn L Elsenhans, Joe E Harlan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Deane v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09136
Plaintiff:
Sydney P. Deane and Nancy A. Deane
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval, Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Carrier Corporation and Eaton Corporation, as successor in interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Aerco International, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Snyder et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv08738
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Snyder and Lynn Snyder
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Carrier Corporation , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Carrier Corporation , General Electric Company , Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , CBS Corporation , Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
