Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Fuller v. Spartanburg County et al
as 6:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Deandre Lashun Fuller
Defendant:
Spartanburg County, Spartanburg County Detention Center, FNU Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Velez v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00518
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP), Warden M. Carr, Ms. FNU Dinkins and others
Plaintiff:
Connie C. Valez and Connie Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lang v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00521
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP), Warden M. Carr, Ms. FNU Dinkins and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balderas v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00496
Defendant:
Dr. Langham, Lt. Butler, FNU Cole-Rowls and others
Plaintiff:
Dominga Balderas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie v. LNU et al
as 5:2019cv00940
Plaintiff:
Sidney JD Leslie
Defendant:
FNU Smith, Mark Knutson, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. Taylor et al
as 1:2018cv01237
Defendant:
County Mayor Jimmy Sain, Dr. Larry Bloomingburg, Nicole Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Perez D. Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Tsali et al
as 6:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Ernest C Tsali, FNU Bishop and FNU Morehouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Garfield County Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
Curry J Soto
Defendant:
Garfield County Sheriffs Office, FNU Niles, FNU Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Buncombe County et al
as 1:2016cv00286
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Morgan, Sr.
Defendant:
Buncombe County, FNU Bishop, FNU Zabloudil and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Niederstadt v. Village of Capitan et al
as 2:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
Charles A Niederstadt
Defendant:
Village of Capitan, Capitan Police Department, Randy Spear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
