Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Jamal Collins v. FNU Clark, et al
as 24-10932
Plaintiff:
JAMAL E. COLLINS
Defendant:
FNU CLARK, individual capacity, FNU FAULKS and ELIZABETH MARTYN, NP, Individual capacity
Bright v. Clark et al
as 5:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carnell Bright
Defendant:
FNU Clark and FNU Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler (ID 126080) v. Topeka Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2023cv03218
Plaintiff:
Katelynn J. Fowler
Defendant:
Topeka Correctional Facility and (fnu) Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toson v. Pantoja et al
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Durand Toson
Defendant:
Thomas M Pantoja, Bryan P McDonald, Myisha S Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cys v. Cook et al
as 6:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Cys
Defendant:
FNU Cook, Dr. Patchin and FNU Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branscomb v. Troll et al
as 5:2023cv03159
Plaintiff:
Darrion Branscomb
Defendant:
(fnu) Troll, (fnu) Dunham, Hannah (lnu) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2023cv03849
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City Of New York, FNU Arzu, FNU Cromartie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bishop
as 23-10607
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raylon Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Ricky Bishop, Sheriff, FNU Blair, Correctional Officer, FNU Olson, Sgt and others
Meyers v. Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens, FNU Bevins, FNU Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
