Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Amy Jenkins, R. Honeycutt, Jeffrey P. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03218
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Cole
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Secretary Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr., Kenneth Lassiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le Maitre v. Chester et al
as 5:2020cv00203
Defendant:
FNU Chester, Justin Wineburger, FNU Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell J. Le Maitre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Love v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 20-7620
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU CHESTER, SWINDELL EDWARDS, FNU DYE and others
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY R. LOVE, a/k/a Jeremy R. Love El, MSTA Branch Temple 43
Gochie v. Chester et al
as 5:2019cv00094
Defendant:
FNU Warnig, FNU Chester, Eric Dye and others
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Gochie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jeremy R. Love and Jeremy R. Love El
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, FNU Dye, FNU Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
FNU Buchanan, FNU Dula and FNU Chester
Plaintiff:
Roger Edwards
LaKemper v. Solomon et al
as 5:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Cobey LaKemper
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, Eric T. Dye, Benjamin A. Carver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
