Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Brown v. Hawk-Sawyer et al
as 1:2019cv00640
Defendant:
FNU Dortch, FNU Ledet, FNU Orin and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence M Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Denning et al
as 3:2019cv00439
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety, State Bureau of Investigation, FNU Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Loggins
as 19-3182
Respondent:
STEPHEN D. HILL, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, DAVID M. UNRUH, Sedgwick County Commissioner, JEFF EASTER, Sedgwick County Sheriff and others
Petitioner:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
WOODS v. BENTLEY et al
as 1:2019cv00743
Defendant:
FNU BENTLEY and FNU LEWIS
Plaintiff:
TRAVON LEVI WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Alford et al
as 6:2019cv00304
Respondent:
Warden Richard Alford, Officer FNU Lockhart, Sgt. FNU Montgomery and others
Petitioner:
Martin Darnell Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Loggins v. Pilshaw, et al
as 19-3065
Defendant / Appellee:
G. GORDON ATCHESON, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, HENRY W. GREEN, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, (FNU) LEWIS, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Kirven v. Stanfill et al
as 2:2018cv01204
Plaintiff:
Loydale Kirven
Defendant:
MS Lewis, Curry County Detention Center, Sgt Stanfill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins (ID 63088) v. Pilshaw et al
as 5:2018cv03254
Defendant:
Richard Ranzau, Thomas Malone, J. Patrick Walter and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Loggins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Solomon et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jordan Andrew Jones
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, W. David Guice, Frank L. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dibrell v. Philip et al
as 1:2018cv00278
Defendant:
Officer FNU Barajas, Lt FNU Fenny, Sgt FNU Gallegos and others
Plaintiff:
Erwin Dibrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
