Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MCCOY v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv04308
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOY
Defendant:
USA, USA BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORT DIX FCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rose v. Warden, Fort Dix FCI
as 1:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Lothario Dion Rose
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WAYS v. CEO & OFFICE OF THE WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv04943
Petitioner:
JOHN WAYS
Respondent:
CEO & OFFICE OF THE WARDEN Of JBMDL, NJ 08640 doing business as FORT DIX (FCI), JOSE CUEVAS, II and CUSTODIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SACKS v. CEO &/OR OFFICE OF THE WARDEN
as 1:2022cv04623
Petitioner:
JEFFREY SACKS
Respondent:
CEO &/OR OFFICE OF THE WARDEN Doing the day-to-day operations at State of New Jersey's federally leased incarceration institution doing business as JBMDL, NJ'S FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CORNELIUS v. WARDEN, FORT DIX FCI
as 1:2015cv06201
Petitioner:
CHARLES CORNELIUS
Respondent:
WARDEN, FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. FORT DIX FCI et al
as 1:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
FORT DIX FCI, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
PODHORN v. FORT DIX FCI
as 1:2009cv04479
Petitioner:
PAUL E. PODHORN, JR.
Respondent:
FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PODHORN v. FORT DIX FCI
as 1:2009cv04449
Petitioner:
PAUL E. PODHORN, JR.
Respondent:
FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REEVES v. FORT DIX, FCI NEW JERSEY
as 1:2008cv06130
Petitioner:
ARNOLD REEVES
Respondent:
FORT DIX, FCI NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
VOID v. WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
as 1:2008cv01252
Petitioner:
JAMES VOID
Respondent:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
