Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2016cv01031
Petitioner:
Jermain Jamal Williams
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Gregory Handy, Sr. v. Frank B. Bishop, Jr.
as 15-8029
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK GREGORY HANDY, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK BISHOP, JR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Marshall v. Roderick et al
as 1:2015cv03872
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
R. S. Roderick, Frank Bishop, Jr. and W. Bohrer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Shearing et al
as 1:2015cv03645
Plaintiff:
Terry L.S. Dorsey
Defendant:
Bobby P. Shearing, Frank Bishop, Jr. and Kevin Lamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar
as 15-7573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD BRINEGAR, C. DAVIS, B. PAYTON and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY GREGG L. HERSHBERGER and SERGEANT CRUMPAC
Robert Cooper v. Roderick Sowers
as 15-7579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK R. SOWERS, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner of Correction, BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden of North Branch Corr. Inst. and others
Fuller v. Bishop et al
as 1:2015cv02643
Petitioner:
Kevin Fuller
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Germain v. Bishop, Jr. et al
as 1:2015cv01885
Plaintiff:
Jean B. Germain
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Jr. , Richard S. Roderick and Troy Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean Germain v. Frank Bishop, Jr.
as 15-6973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN BERNARD GERMAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, JR., BRUCE LILLER, Chief of Psychology, WILLIAM BEAMAN, Director of Nursing and others
Germain v. Bishop et al
as 1:2015cv01421
Plaintiff:
Jean B. Germain
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Jr., Bruce A. Liller, William Beaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
