Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PANDOLFO et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05824
Plaintiff:
FRANK PANDOLFO , VICTOR MANUEL PARGAS , ZAIDA M. PARKER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pandolfo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03100
Plaintiff:
Frank Pandolfo , Victor Manuel Pargas , Zaida M Parker and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frederick Rivers v. SCI Huntingdon Prison, et al
as 13-2355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCI HUNTINGDON, TABB BICKELL, Superintendent, MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT and others
In re: Frederick River
as 13-2217
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK RIVERS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Frederick Rivers v. SCI Huntingdon Prison
as 13-1509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCI HUNTINGDON
Rivers v. S.C.I. Huntingdon Prison
as 1:2012cv02620
Plaintiff:
Frederick Rivers
Defendant:
S.C.I. Huntingdon Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Frederick River
as 12-2867
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK RIVERS
Defendant - Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
RIVERS et al v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2012cv03417
Petitioner:
FREDERICK RIVERS
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH R. WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frederick Rivers v. Robert Lawler, et al
as 11-2247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT LAWLER, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
RIVERS et al v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2010cv04211
Petitioner:
FREDERICK RIVERS
Respondent:
ROBERT LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH R. WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
