Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cuara R. v. North Point Industrial et al
as 2:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
North Point Industrial, Iom Freeman, Travis Healey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Bowles et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Kent Johnson, Joshua Peterson, Grace Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Bryan Bowles, Cynthia Phillips, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Pure Way et al v. IForce Internet Holdings et al
as 2:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Pure Way and Mitchell Bradley Freeman
Defendant:
IForce Internet Holdings and Alex Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IForce Internet Holdings v. Waterfeaturesupply.com et al
as 2:2015cv00640
Plaintiff:
IForce Internet Holdings
Defendant:
Waterfeaturesupply.com and Mitchell Bradley Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padley v. Clearfield City et al
as 1:2011cv00141
Plaintiff:
Richard Padley
Defendant:
Clearfield City , Clearfield City Police Department and FNU Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wing v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv00407
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Wing and Robert G. Wing
Defendant:
Steven W. Allen, Phillip L. Barlow, Roger M. Bunker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
