Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc v. United States Forest Service
as 3:2021cv00239
Defendant:
United States Forest Service
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., and Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0544
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Columbia River Commission, et al
as 20-35390
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC. and COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
RICHARD DAVIAU, in his official capacity as County Planner of Clark County, KEVIN A. PRIDEMORE, in his official capacity as Code Enforcement Coordinator of Clark County, CLARK COUNTY, Washington and others
Plaintiff:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Friends of the Columbia Gorge,, et al
as 20-35205
Defendant:
RICHARD DAVIAU, in his official capacity as County Planner of Clark County, KEVIN A. PRIDEMORE, in his official capacity as Code Enforcement Coordinator of Clark County, CLARK COUNTY, Washington and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE COMMISSION and FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC.
Plaintiff:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
BNSF Railway Company v. Clark County et al
as 3:2018cv05926
Defendant:
Richard Daviau, Mitch Nickolds, Clark County and others
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Intervenor Defendant:
Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Columbia River Gorge Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rod Runyon, et al
as 17-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD RUNYON, Commission Chair of the Wasco County Board of Commissioners, STEVE KRAMER, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners, SCOTT HEGE, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and OREGON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Movant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION, THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Runyon et al
as 3:2017cv00038
Defendant:
Gorham Blaine, Bowen Blair, Angie Brewer and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Columbia Riverkeeper, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility
Movant:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Sierra Club et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2014cv00660
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club , Puget Soundkeeper Alliance , Re Sources For Sustainable Communities and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Sierra Club et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club , Puget Soundkeeper Alliance , Re Sources For Sustainable Communities and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Sierra Club Inc et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club , Puget Soundkeeper Alliance , RE Sources For Sustainable Communities and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Brown et al v. Secretary of The U.S. Department Of Agriculture et al
as 3:2011cv00895
Plaintiff:
Keith Brown, James Vincent Chase, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kent P. Connaughton and Secretary of The U.S. Department Of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0544 Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
