Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Sey v. Knorr-Bremse AG et al
as 1:2018cv01433
Plaintiff:
Omar Sey
Defendant:
Knorr-Bremse AG , Knorr Brake Company LLC , New York Air Brake LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
OCHOA v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as 2:2018cv00638
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY J. OCHOA
Defendant:
KNORR-BREMSE AG, KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, NEW YORK AIR BRAKE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Stewart v. Knorr-Bremse AG et al
as 1:2018cv01275
Plaintiff:
Sloan Stewart
Defendant:
Knorr-Bremse AG, Knorr Brake Company LLC, New York Air Brake LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Lucas v. Knorr-Bremse AG et al
as 1:2018cv01280
Plaintiff:
John W Lucas
Defendant:
Knorr-Bremse AG, Knorr Brake Company LLC, New York Air Brake LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
CARON v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as 2:2018cv00564
Plaintiff:
JASON CARON
Defendant:
KNORR-BREMSE AG, KNORR BRAKE COMPANY LLC, NEW YORK AIR BRAKE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
THEOBALD v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as PAW/2:18-cv-00526
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN THEOBALD
Defendant:
KNORR-BREMSE AG , KNORR BRAKE COMPANY , NEW YORK AIR BRAKE COMPANY and others
Arcuri et al v. Knorr-Bremse AG et al
as MD/1:18-cv-01191
Plaintiff:
Paul Arcuri and Ashley Kerr
Defendant:
Knorr-Bremse AG , Knorr Brake Company LLC , New York Air Brake LLC and others
CARRUTH v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as PAW/2:18-cv-00469
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS CARRUTH
Defendant:
KNORR-BREMSE AG , KNORR BRAKE COMPANY , NEW YORK AIR BRAKE COMPANY and others
THEOBALD v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as 2:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN THEOBALD
Defendant:
KNORR-BREMSE AG, KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, NEW YORK AIR BRAKE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Arcuri et al v. Knorr-Bremse AG et al
as 1:2018cv01191
Plaintiff:
Paul Arcuri and Ashley Kerr
Defendant:
Knorr-Bremse AG , Knorr Brake Company LLC , New York Air Brake LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
