Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Fayette County Schools District, Fayette County, State of Alabama v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08686
Plaintiff:
Fayette County Schools District, Fayette County, State of Alabama
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.P. v. Fayette County School District, et al
as 21-12562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A.P.
Defendant / Appellee:
FAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOSEPH BARROW, JR., DAN LANE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Tamara Brown v. Marlon King, et al
as 21-5245
Defendant / Appellee:
FAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOLS, FAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD and MARLON KING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMARA BROWN
L. v. Benton et al
as 6:2020cv01309
Defendant:
Lamar Harris, Tim J Dunavant, Timothy Vess Benton and others
Plaintiff:
J. L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jerri Todd v. Fayette County School District
as 19-13821
Defendant / Appellee:
FAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRI TODD
Walker v. Fayette County Schools et al
as 2:2019cv02562
Defendant:
Diane Watkins, Jane Doe, James Teague and others
Plaintiff:
Tametrius Walker
Not Yet Classified:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
