Cases 1 - 10 of 760
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Petlechkov v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2025cv02170
Plaintiff:
Dimitar Petlechkov
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation and Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gary Wall v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2025cv01265
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation and Does 1-100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MCDANIEL et al v. ZANDERS
as 1:2025cv00245
Plaintiff:
Robert McDaniel, FEDEX CORPORATION and Tony Zanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc et al
as 3:2025cv00220
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System Inc, FedEx Corporation and Federal Express FSC Merger Sub LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Myers v. FedEx Corporation
as 4:2025cv00009
Plaintiff:
Peter Myers
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Myers v. FedEx Corporation
as 1:2025cv00003
Plaintiff:
Peter Myers
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Fung v. FedEx Corporation
as 3:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Yip-Hung Fung
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Saucedo v. Fedex Corp., et al
as 2:2025cv00027
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., FedEx Supply Chain, Inc., Fedex Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Perez Saucedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
