Cases 1 - 10 of 6,715
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv20694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
In re: Kotevski
as 25-4016
Petitioner:
In re: MILAN MICHAEL KOTEVSKI
Respondent:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH and others
Sgro v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 8:2025cv00367
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Sgro
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anthony v. United States of America et al
as 2:2025cv02073
Plaintiff:
Dominic John Anthony
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-10459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CATO INSTITUTE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2025cv00399
Plaintiff:
CATO INSTITUTE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Notz v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
as 5:2025cv00101
Plaintiff:
Arthur M. Notz, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathon Ramos v. Elizabeth Singleton et al
as 8:2025cv00254
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Ramos
Defendant:
Elizabeth Singleton, Glenn Coleman, Tanya Degrate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Samsonov v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2025cv01306
Plaintiff:
Nikolay N. Samsonov
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-5023
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.