Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Schick v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Wayne Schick, FBI, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Schick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ingram v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
DeSean Ingram
Defendant:
U.S. Government, University Hospital, CDC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Williams v. Beaver Creek Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
James Williams, IV
Defendant:
Beaver Creek Police Dept. and Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liu et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Xia-Ying Liu and Chu Tzu Yeh
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Antony Blinken and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Warman v. Mount St. Joseph University et al
as 1:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Matthew Warman
Defendant:
Mount St. Joseph University, Mount St. Joseph Police Department, Kevin Koo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
