Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RUIZ-MOJICA v FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC et al
as 4:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Cristhian Ruiz-Mojica
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC, Ahmed Hamdy Eldahy and AHMED HAMDY ELDALY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
LONGMIRE v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC
as 4:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jordan Longmire
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hammad v. Fedex Corporation
as 8:2021cv02297
Plaintiff:
Badran Hammad
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. and Fedex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAUTYMAN v. LILYANDMAJOR, LLC et al
as 9:2020cv81290
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., LILYANDMAJOR, LLC d/b/a TRIPHERO, CITIGROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J BEAUTYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BALDWIN, JR. v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
as 4:2020cv00274
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARTIN RENATE BALDWIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
