Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Montiel v. Yates, et al.

as 1:2011cv02145
Plaintiff:
Jesse J. Montiel
Defendant:
James Yates, Felix Igbinosa, Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanear v. Cate et al

as 1:2011cv02086
Plaintiff:
Frank Lanear
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Robert H. Trimble and Felix Igbinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Cate et al

as 1:2011cv02020
Plaintiff:
Willie Stewart
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James Yates and Felix Igbinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce Koklich v. James Yates, et al
as 11-17886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE KOKLICH
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden, P. MENDOZA, Correctional Officer, CHAMNESS, Correctional Officer and others
Zelig v. Igbinosa, M.D. et al

as 1:2011cv01515
Plaintiff:
Harry Zelig
Defendant:
Felix Igbinosa, M.D., James Yates, Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. Yates et al

as 1:2011cv01507
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011at00503
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al

as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Chavez v. James Yates, et al

as 11-16888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. CHAVEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, Warden, FELIX IGBINOSA, Chief Medical Officer, AHLIN, Associate Warden and others
Cruz v. Tilton, et al.

as 1:2011cv00992
Plaintiff:
Richard - Cruz
Defendant:
James Tilton, Scott Kernan, James Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.