Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011at00554
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Clark J. Kelso, James A. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011at00503
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Chavez v. James Yates, et al
as 11-16888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. CHAVEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, Warden, FELIX IGBINOSA, Chief Medical Officer, AHLIN, Associate Warden and others
Cruz v. Tilton, et al.
as 1:2011cv00992
Plaintiff:
Richard - Cruz
Defendant:
James Tilton, Scott Kernan, James Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siordia v. Cate, et al.
as 1:2011cv00742
Plaintiff:
Robert Siordia
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James A. Yates and Felix Igbinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Yates et al
as 1:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pearson
Defendant:
James A. Yates, Felix Igbinosa, M.D., Randolph Wilson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koufos v. Manasrah et al
as 1:2010cv02412
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Koufos
Defendant:
A. Manasrah, Janice Ortiz-Singh, A. Duenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Cates et al
as 1:2010cv02055
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miles
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, James Yates, Felix Igbinosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis, Jr. v. Greenman et al
as 1:2010cv01825
Plaintiff:
Joe Owen Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Ellen Greenman, S. Abdou, P. Safi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
