Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv96157
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Llewellen Smith v. Warden
as 15-13996
Petitioner - Appellant:
LLEWELLEN FERNANDO SMITH, a.k.a. Llewelen F. Smith
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - LOW WARDEN
In re: Llewellen Smith
as 15-13315
Petitioner:
In re: LLEWELLEN FERNANDO SMITH
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Llewelen Fernando Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00620
Plaintiff:
Llewelen Fernando Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2014cv00035
Petitioner:
Llewellen Fernando Smith
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ABDULLAH et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv06774
Plaintiff:
RAHIM ABDULLAH , DENISE ABDULLAH , THORNTON CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abdullah et al v. National Footbal League, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08055
Plaintiff:
Rahim Abdullah , Denise Abdullah , Thornton Chandler and others
Defendant:
National Footbal League, Inc. and NFL Properties, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Llewellen Smith
as 12-7003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LLEWELLEN FERNANDO SMITH, a/k/a Louie
ALLEN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01281
Plaintiff:
ERIC ALLEN , LYNN ALLEN , ROBERT DELPINO and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
