Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Studio Transportation Drivers, et al v. Entertainment Media Specialist, et al
as 09-56997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STUDIO TRANSPORTATION DRIVERS LOCAL 399 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, on behalf of members formerly employed by defendants, BERNARD ANGELES, Jr., JAMES DEPUE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA SPECIALISTS, INC., a Florida corporation
Defendant:
HAPPY HOUR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, RAJ SHAH, FILMKRAFT PRODUCTIONS (INDIA) PVT., LTD.,, an Indian company and others
Studio Transportation Drivers, et al v. Entertainment Media Specialist, et al
as 09-56997
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STUDIO TRANSPORTATION DRIVERS LOCAL 399 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, on behalf of members formerly employed by defendants, BERNARD ANGELES, Jr., JAMES DEPUE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA SPECIALISTS, INC., a Florida corporation
Defendant:
HAPPY HOUR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, RAJ SHAH, FILMKRAFT PRODUCTIONS (INDIA) PVT., LTD.,, an Indian company and others
Studio Transportation Drivers Local 399 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Happy Hour Productions LLC et al
as 8:2008cv01117
Plaintiff:
Studio Transportation Drivers Local 399 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Bernard Angeles, Jr, James Depue and others
Defendant:
Happy Hour Productions LLC, Bollywood Hollywood Production Inc, Filmkraft Productions (India) PVT Ltd and others
Cross Defendant:
Prashant Shah and Happy Hours Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
FilmKraft Productions India PVT Ltd. v. Spektrum Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01293
Defendant:
Raj Shah and Spektrum Entertainment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
FilmKraft Productions India PVT Ltd.
Counter Claimant:
Bina Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
