Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
EMAMI v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv02891
Plaintiff:
DR. ARASH EMAMI
Defendant:
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
FlightSafety International, Inc. v. Air Force
as 23-1700
Appellant:
FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
FlightSafety International Inc. v. Perimeter International et al
as 4:2020cv01681
Defendant:
PERIMETER INTERNATIONAL d/b/a PERIMETER GLOBAL LOGISTICS, R&R EXPRESS, INC., MEI RIGGING & CRATING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flightsafety International, Inc. v. Harris Corporation
as 1:2018cv06674
Defendant:
Harris Corporation
Plaintiff:
Flightsafety International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Elder v. FlightSafety International Inc.
as 2:2018cv14098
Plaintiff:
Orr "Jay" Elder
Defendant:
FlightSafety International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC. v. USA
as 1:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
CAE USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Dungan v. Flightsafety International Inc.
as 1:2015cv00989
Plaintiff:
Dean Dungan
Defendant:
Flightsafety International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
