Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Campbell v. Warden, Florida State Prison (Union)
as 2:2025cv00335
Petitioner:
Remoi Campbell
Respondent:
Warden, Florida State Prison (Union)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Emanoillidis et al
as 3:2025cv00411
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
Dr. George Emanoillidis, Dr. Beard, A. Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee, James v. Florida Department of Corrections et al

as 1:2025cv21726
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Lee
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, South Bay Correctional Facility, M. Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. Florida State Prison

as 2:2025cv00241
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Bowens, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinney v. Bradford County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2025cv00303
Plaintiff:
Tramaine Collin Kinney
Defendant:
Bradford County Sheriffs Department, Florida State Prison and Inspector General's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2025cv00296
Plaintiff:
Barton Coy Hill
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2025cv00276
Plaintiff:
Lee Adams
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2025cv00277
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bowen
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Tobin v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 25-10326
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW A. TOBIN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OKALOOSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FLORIDA STATE PRISON and others
Adams v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2025cv00012
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.