Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MCCRAY v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
DARRIN MCCRAY
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, ASHLEY MOODY and LAMAR TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Vardon v. Florida State Board of Admini
as 11-14394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. VARDON
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. Baugh et al
as 9:2011cv80650
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas , Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Wilmington Trust Company
Defendant:
Charles R. Baugh, HOWARD BERKOWITZ, Anne S. Scheiermann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vardon v. Florida State Board of Administration
as 8:2011cv01032
Plaintiff:
James M. Vardon
Defendant:
Florida State Board of Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
MYERS, et al v. SCHERING-PLOUGH, et al
as 2:2001cv00829
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION , RICHARD J. KOGAN , THOMAS H. KELLY and others
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION and MARVIN MYERS
Movant:
LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THOMAS A. ENDICOTT and RONGELAP CLAIMS TR RITTENHOUSE FUND
Consol_plaintiff:
BRIDGEWATER PARTNERS, LP , STEVEN GREENE , BRENDA GREENBLATT and others
Consol_defendant:
JAMES WOOD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Cohn, et al v. Critical Path Inc., et al
as 3:2001cv00551
Plaintiff:
Arnold Cohn , Florida State Board of Administration and Sambasiba Avirneni
Defendant:
Critical Path Inc., David Hayden, David A. Thatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
IN RE American International Group, Inc Securities Litigation
as 1:2004cv08141
Lead Plaintiff:
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Feder and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jerome Noll, Stephan Frank, Joseph Scuilla and others
Appellant:
Alan Rothstein, Marisa Rothstein, Mollye Rothstein and others
Petitioner:
THE STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, CUSTODIAN OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, MICHIGAN STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AN, Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, The Reynolds Group and others
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc., Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
State of New York Attorney General Office and Marshall Orloff
Not Classified By Court:
Margaret B. Amidei, KAREN J MICHAELS, Lee Janovits and others
Interested Party:
Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System
Amicus Curiae:
North American Securties Administrators Association, Inc.
Intervenor:
Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund and James Connolly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2001cv03624
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: DaimlerChrysler, et al v. , et al
as 1:2000cv00993
Plaintiff:
Stanley P. Kops, P.C., 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, Denver Employees Retirement Plan, Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and others
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler AG, Daimler-Benz AG, Juergen Schrempp and others
Petitioner:
Roger Heymann, Kornitzer Capital Management, Leon S. Buchka and others
Tracinda Corporation v. DaimlerChrysler AG, et al
as 1:2000cv00984
Plaintiff:
Tracinda Corporation
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler AG, Daimler-Benz AG, Juergen Schrempp and others
Petitioner:
Florida State Board of Administration, Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago, Municipal Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
