Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Dutschmann
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gerads v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2023cv03672
Plaintiff:
James Gerads
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff:
David Crooks
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ortman v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05042
Plaintiff:
David Ortman
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Horton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
JULIA, Individually and as Special Administrator o HORTON and Julia Horton
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., as Successor-in-Interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY, AR WILFLEY AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Marcia Vanover v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
MARCIA VANOVER, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of DAVID VANOVER, Deceased and Marica Vanover
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., A.O. Smith Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. and Pneumo Abex LLC
Cross Defendant:
Kohler, Co., Sid Harvey Industries Inc. and York International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff:
Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant:
John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Murphy v. Air Liquid Systems Inc, et al
as 3:2021cv00519
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, as successor-by-merger to WHITE CONSOLDATED INDUSTRIES, as successor-by-merger to COPES VULCAN, INC., GARDNER DENVER, INC., ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lishman et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01570
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Inc Caterpillar, Crane Co. and others
Counter Defendant:
Nash Engineering Co., Inc., Flowserve US Inc., Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Tate Andale, Inc., Velan Valve Corp., Honeywell International Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
John Crane Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vicki Lishman
Cross Claimant:
Grinnell LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Williamson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01391
Defendant:
Cameron International Corp., Industrial Holdings Corporation f/k/a Carborundum Company, Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
