Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02072
Petitioner:
Melvin Hudson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr.
as 24-5043
Petitioner:
RICKEY BENSON
Respondent:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Sheriff
Mason v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Devonte D. Mason
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Office, Chief Burnett, Captain Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02763
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Floyd Bonner, Jr. and Chief Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marilyn Donald, et al v. Bonner, et al
as 2:2023cv02738
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Shelby County and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Donald and Charles Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Foster v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02356
Plaintiff:
Loyd Wayne Foster
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr. and Shelby County Sheriffs Jail Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nisbett v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nerven Nisbett
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioner, Chief Kirk Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Guy v. City of Memphis (Memphis Police Department) et al
as 2:2023cv02234
Plaintiff:
Christopher Guy
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parker v. Bonner
as 2:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
Tracy Parker
Defendant:
Sheriff Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
