Cases 1 - 8 of 8
White v. Keith et al
as 8:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
Floyd White, Jr.
Defendant:
Edward Taylor Keith, John Edward Nash, Jr., James Laverne Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
White v. Smith et al
as 1:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Floyd White
Defendant:
Rucker Smith, Nancy C. Smith, Samuel Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dameon Spencer v. Floyd White, et al
as 10-1417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dameon Spencer
Defendant - Appellee:
Floyd White, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Chicot County, Arkansas, Ron Nichols, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Chicot County, Arkansas and Mark Cashion, Individually and in his Capacity as Keeper of the Jail for the Arkansas Department of Correction
WHITE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv74970
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FLOYD WHITE, WILLIAM FLOYD WHITE, KATHERINE WHITE and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
White v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2009cv05059
Plaintiff:
Floyd White
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spencer v. White et al
as 5:2008cv00235
Plaintiff:
Dameon Spencer and Dameon Spencer
Defendant:
Floyd White, Ron Nichols and Mark Cashion
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phillips v. Richardson et al
as 5:2007cv00177
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Phillips and Kenneth W Phillips
Defendant:
Leonard C Richardson, Dermott City of, Chicot County, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spenser v. Chicot County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2007cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dameon Spenser
Defendant:
Chicot County, Arkansas, Floyd White, Ron Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
