Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Banks v. Flying J., Inc.
as 6:2009cv00287
Petitioner:
Robert E. Banks
Respondent:
Flying J., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Universal Delaware v. Ceridian
as 2:2009cv00169
Petitioner:
Comdata Corporation, Comdata Corporation, Comdata Corporation and others
Respondent:
TCH, TCH, TCH and others
Plaintiff:
Universal Delaware, Universal Delaware and Universal Delaware
Movant:
Gerald F. Krachey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flying J Inc. v. TA Operating Corporation
as 09-5847
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FLYING J INC., A Utah Corporation, et al
Defendant:
TA OPERATING CORPORATION, a Deleware Corporation, et al, dba Travelcenters of America
Intervenor - Appellant:
USAO UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Griffith v. Flying J Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jack Griffith
Defendant:
Flying J Inc., Flying J Inc., CFJ Plaza Company II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grubaugh v. Flying J Inc.
as 4:2009cv00564
Plaintiff:
James Grubaugh
Defendant:
Flying J Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00113
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
