Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Hasalee Mims v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 22-14169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HASALEE MIMS
Defendant / Appellee:
KAY IVEY, FOB JAMES and U.S. CONGRESS
Mickles v. Naples, Florida et al
as 1:2022cv21396
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Naples, Florida, Pensacola, Florida, Cavazos Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mims v. Ivey et al
as 7:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Hasalee Mims
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Fob James and United States Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00254
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen, et al v. AL Board/Education, et al
as 2:1981cv00697
Plaintiff:
Margaret T. Allen , Yolanda F. Lamar and Beverly K. Jones
Defendant:
The Alabama State Board of Education , Fob James , John M. Tyson, Jr. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Board of Trustees for Alabama State University , Eria P. Smith , Judy P. Lockhart and others
Amicu:
National Evaluation System, Inc.
Movant:
Don Siegelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
