Cases 1 - 10 of 631
MULAWKA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
MARZENA MULAWKA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MERCER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REDFORD et al v. ABRUTYN et al
as 2:2011cv05130
Plaintiff:
SAPHYRE REDFORD, DANIELLE BITON and CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON
Defendant:
MORGAN MELHUISH ABRUTYN, ED DWECK, KATHLEEN CARLA ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIDGER v. BORG-WARNER et al
as 2:2010cv79293
Plaintiff:
LINDA P. BRIDGER
Defendant:
BORG-WARNER , CHRYSLER CORPORATION , EATON CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRODERICK et al v. ARMCO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62985
Plaintiff:
ENID BRODERICK, ARLETTE GILBERT, STEVEN BRODERICK and others
Defendant:
ARMCO, INC., ARMCO, INC., ABEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ABRAMS v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86135
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER ABRAMS
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRENT v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86141
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE BRENT
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TANNER v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86184
Plaintiff:
WADE TANNER
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRADY v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86142
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BRADY
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HILL v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86156
Plaintiff:
STEVE HILL
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BLACKWELL v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE C. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
