Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Summage et al v. Forrest City Arkansas, City of
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Willie Summage, Terrence Triggs and Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Forrest City Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Melton v. Forrest City Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
Steven Melton
Defendant:
Forrest City Arkansas, City of and Cedric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Atwater et al v. Brayboy et al
as 2:2019cv00158
Plaintiff:
Kenny Warren Grady, II and Sandra Atwater
Defendant:
Forrest City Arkansas, City of, Forrest City Police Department and Vanessa Brayboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Bible et al
as 2:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Forrest City Arkansas, City of, Pamela Bible, Mary Bible and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Forrest City Arkansas, City of et al
as 2:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Grant Long
Defendant:
Forrest City Arkansas, City of, Larry Bryant, Danny Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Summers v. Forrest City Arkansas, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Leslie Summers
Defendant:
Forrest City Arkansas, City of , James Tucker, Ronnie Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
