Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SEACC, et al v. USFS, et al
as 15-35232
:
In re: BIG THORNE PROJECT AND 2008 TONGASS FOREST PLAN
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Plaintiff:
CASCADIA WILDLANDS, GREATER SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COMMUNITY, GREENPEACE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, BETH PENDLETON, in her officially capacity as United States Forest Service Region 10 Regional Forester and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA, ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, INC., SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE and others
Cascadia Wildlands et al v. Cole et al
as 1:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Cascadia Wildlands , Greater Southeast Alaska Conservation Community , Greenpeace and others
Defendant:
Forrest Cole, Beth Pendleton, Thomas L. Tidwell and others
Movant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council , Alaska Wilderness League , Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beth Pendleton and others
Movant:
State of Alaska and Alaska Forest Association Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council , Sierra Club , Natural Resources Defense Council and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas L. Tidwell and others
Movant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. USFS, et al
as 10-35904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, GREENPEACE and CASCADIA WILDLANDS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, US Department of Agriculture, FORREST COLE, Tongass National Forest Supervisor, BETH PENDLETON, Alaska Regional Forester and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
VIKING LUMBER COMPANY, INC., ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION and CITY OF COFFMAN COVE, ALASKA
Greenpeace, Inc., et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 10-35567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREENPEACE, INC. and CASCADIA WILDLANDS PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee:
FORREST COLE, Tongass National Forest Supervisor, BETH PENDLETON, Alaska Regional Forester and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.D. Department of Agriculture
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. USFS, et al
as 10-35232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, GREENPEACE and CASCADIA WILDLANDS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, US Department of Agriculture, FORREST COLE, Tongass National Forest Supervisor and BETH PENDLETON, Alaska Regional Forester
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
VIKING LUMBER COMPANY, INC., ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, CITY OF COFFMAN COVE, ALASKA and others
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 10-35155
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Tongass Conservation Society et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 3:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tongass Conservation Society, Greenpeace and Cascadia Wildlands
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Forrest Cole and Ruth Monahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 09-35451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
