Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harrell v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02622
Plaintiff:
Blanche S Harrell
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc., Arvinmeritor, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rhodes et al v. MCIC, Inc et al
as 1:2016cv02459
Plaintiff:
Esther Rhodes , Bette Rhodes Beachy , Cathy Joyce Varela and others
Defendant:
MCIC, Inc , Uniroyal, Inc. , CBS Corporation of Delaware and others
Cross_claimant:
Foster Wheeler, LLC. , Pneumo Abex LLC. , Schneider Electric USA, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Foster Wheeler, LLC. , A.W. Chesterton Co. , Arvinmeritor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sawyer et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Janya Sawyer , Garnette Morris , Nancy Pike and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Owens-Illinois Glass Co., and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Phelps Packing & Rubber Co. , J.H. France Refractories Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc. , CBS Corporation , Cooper Industries, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
General Refractories Co., Hopeman Brothers, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MCIC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Smith et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03742
Plaintiff:
Tynan Smith and Mary Ellen Smith
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Netzer v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01589
Plaintiff:
Henry G. Netzer
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Owens-Illinois Glass Co. and others
Cross_claimant:
J.H. France Refractories Co. , CBS Corporation , International Paper Company and others
Cross_defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company , Bayer Cropscience, Inc. , CBS Corporation and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Donzie Bailey and Richard Ament
Consol_defendant:
A C & R Insulation Company, Inc., C. J. Coakley Co., Inc., Cooper Industries and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MCIC, Inc., E.L. Stebbing & Co. Inc. and Hampshire Industries, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
General Refractories Co., Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sroka et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv03281
Plaintiff:
John E. Sroka and Constance B. Sroka
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Owens-Illinois Glass Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Citrano v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02158
Plaintiff:
Dennis C. Citrano
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. , Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Annette C. Snyder , Mark A. Plasecki , Dennis C. Citrano, II and others
Consol_defendant:
Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. , Georgia-Pacific, LLC and Hopeman Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Covington et al v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. et al
as 1:2012cv00461
Plaintiff:
Lisa Covington , Marquise Garnes , Otis Garnes and others
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois Glass Co. , Durabla Manufacturing Company, Universal Refractories Company and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
John Crane Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shorter et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01874
Plaintiff:
Bernard Shorter and Gertrude Shorter
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E. L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00798
Plaintiff:
William J. Lee, Sr. and Shirley Lee
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., E. L. Stebbing & Co., Inc., Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
