Cases 21 - 30 of 320
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Clark v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv10759
Plaintiff:
James Lee Clark, III and Tebtu Shekem
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, 50th District Court, Michael C Martinez and others
Jones v. Fowlkes Gross et al
as 2:2023cv10520
Plaintiff:
Blake Jones
Defendant:
Ronda M. Fowlkes Gross, Todd Hunt, James O'Shea and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Jones v. Fowlkes Gross et al
as 2:2023cv10246
Plaintiff:
Blake Jones
Defendant:
Ronda M. Fowlkes Gross, Todd Hunt, James O'Shea and others
Bryan Jones v. Warden, et al
as 23-10285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN L. VIZION JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, GD & CP, JOSEPH P. FOWLKES, GD & CP, FOGUM, GD & CP and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 22-6103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Roe v. Fowlkes Tucker et al
as 3:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker, Rebecca Young, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wise v. State of Texas et al
as 2:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michael R Wise
Defendant:
State of Texas, Matthew C Martindale, Angela N Fowlkes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
