Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Gonzalez v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 8:2025cv01605
Plaintiff:
Francisco Gonzalez
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11608
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lucas Francisco-Gonzalez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 25-2063
Petitioner:
LUCAS FRANCISCO-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morris et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv04039
Defendant:
3M Company, EIDP Inc, Dupont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Granville Morris, Gloria Adams, Jack Bartelme, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States v. Mora
as 25-5030
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FELIPE BAUTISTA MORA, AKA Francisco Bautista-Mora, AKA Carlos Mora, AKA Francisco Gonzalez-Gonzalez, AKA Carlos Mora Camberos
Gonzalez Sanchez v. USA
as 2:2025cv00012
Petitioner:
Francisco Gonzalez Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Morris et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv00182
Defendant:
3M Company, EIDP, Inc., Dupont De Nemours, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Granville Morris, Gloria Adams, Jack Bartelme, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
