Cases 1 - 10 of 399
WALKER v. NATIONAL PROPERTY BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WALKER
Defendant:
NATIONAL PROPERTY BOARD, ANDREAS TEN BERGE, URLIKA FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
NEVILLE v. SUELZER et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Not Yet Classified:
TINA NEVILLE, MG Thomas Suelzer, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Plaintiff:
TINA ANN NEVILLE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. SUELZER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03337
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L. BARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MOSES v. AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2023cv03239
Plaintiff:
LAUREN ASHLEY MOSES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, FRANK KENDALL and ALEX WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02746
Petitioner:
JOHN MUSSINGTON, JACKLYN FRANK and LESLIE THOMAS KC
Respondent:
DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
MUSSINGTON et al v. DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2023mc00093
Petitioner:
JOHN MUSSINGTON, JACKLYN FRANK and LESLIE THOMAS KC
Respondent:
DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BERRY v. YELLIN et al
as 1:2023cv02519
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT RUBIN, CITIBANK, ALAN GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
