Cases 1 - 10 of 22
United States of America v. Amaya-Sanchez (Hernandez)
as 24-352
Defendant:
EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAMS CASTELLANOS, ELMER ALEXANDER LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(HC) Berry v. Campbell
as 2:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Frank Alexander Berry
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Alexander v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04688
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Pizzurro v. Hamilton CI - Main Warden, et al
as 21-13348
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK ALEXANDER PIZZURRO
Respondent / Appellee:
HAMILTON CI - MAIN WARDEN, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States v. Lynch
as 21-1178
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK ALEXANDER LYNCH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pizzurro v. Young et al (Lee County)
as 2:2019cv00861
Defendant:
Glenn Young, Ashley Moody and Mark S. Inch
Petitioner:
Frank Alexander Pizzurro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frank Grant v. PY Holding LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10260
Defendant:
alan bushell, AVIS Budget Group, Inc., PY Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Alexander Grant IV and Frank Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuel Gonzales v. ConocoPhillips Company, et al
as 19-20467
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN MECHAM, FRANK ALEXANDER, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL GONZALES
Samuel Gonzales v. ConocoPhillips Company, et al
as 19-20285
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN MECHAM, FRANK ALEXANDER, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL GONZALES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
