Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jill Miceli, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 15-50736
Plaintiff - Appellant: JILL MICELI and FRANK MICELI
Defendant - Appellee: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS, Incorporated, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-12, formerly known as Bank of New York and CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWABS, INCORPORATED, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-12
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 137, 137A, 137B,137C & 137R, Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Apprenticeship Skill Improvement & Safety Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers et al v. Frank Miceli Jr. Contracting, Inc.
as 7:2014cv07832
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 137, 137A, 137B,137C & 137R, Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Apprenticeship Skill Improvement & Safety Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers and The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 137, 137A, 137B, 137C & 137R
Defendant: Frank Miceli Jr. Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 137, 137A, 137B, 137C & 137R v. Frank Miceli Jr. Contracting, Inc.
as 7:2014cv03351
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Operating Engineers Local 137, 137A, 137B, 137C & 137R Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Apprenticeship Skill Improvement & Safety Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers, and the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 137, 137A, 137B, 137C & 137R
Defendant: Frank Miceli Jr. Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Miceli et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01032
Counter Defendant: Frank Miceli and Jill Miceli
Plaintiff: Frank Miceli and Jill Miceli
Counter Plaintiff: The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Upstate New York Engineers Health Fund et al v. FMC Demolition, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv01307
Plaintiff: Upstate New York Engineers Health Fund , Upstate New York Engineers Pension Fund , Upstate New York Engineers S.U.B. Fund and others
Defendant: FMC Demolition, Inc., Frank Miceli Jr., Contracting, Inc., FMC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Trustees of the Local 813 Pension Trust Fund v. Frank Miceli Jr. Contracting, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00198
Defendant: Frank Miceli Jr. Contracting, Inc.
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Local 813 Pension Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Brown v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05240
Plaintiff: Akeen Brown
Defendant: City of New York, P.O. Daniel Gonzalez, Police Officers John Doe #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miceli v. Tremco Corporation
as 1:2010cv00510
Plaintiff: Joseph Frank Miceli
Defendant: Tremco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Apprenticeship Skill Improvement and Safety Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 137, 137A, 137B, 137C & 137R, AFL-CIO et al v. Frank Miceli Jr. Contracting, Inc.
as 7:2009cv08848
Plaintiff: The Annuity, Pension, Welfare and Apprenticeship Skill Improvement and Safety Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 137, 137A, 137B, 137C & 137R, AFL-CIO, Jeffrey Loughlin, Peter Paterno and others
Defendant: Frank Miceli Jr. Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None
Santiago v. City Of Chicago et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv03137
Plaintiff: Esteban Santiago, Esteban Santiago, Esteban Santiago and others
Defendant: City Of Chicago, William Burtner, Todd Partyka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?